英语作文how to elimmate academic cheating

英语作文how to elimmate academic cheating,第1张

  Over the past three academic years, the National Center for Fair & Open Testing has confirmed cases of standardized test cheating in 32 states and the District of Columbia (see attached list) The root cause of this epidemic is clear from in-depth investigations into some of the most egregious scandals Misuse of standardized tests mandated by public officials has created a climate in which increasing numbers of educators feel they have no choice but to cross ethical lines
  If the US Department of Education is serious about its commitment to assessment integrity, it must act to reduce test cheating by stopping promotion of test score misuse
  Despite their high-sounding statements about assessment reform, President Obama and Secretary Duncan are adding incentives for cheating by ratcheting up the emphasis on standardized exams scores through initiatives such as “Race to the Top” and their criteria for states to receive waivers from “No Child Left Behind” The continued emphasis on annual high-stakes annual testing in these programs and, especially, new requirements to assess teachers based on their students’ scores virtually guarantees even more cheating will take place
  The administration’s favored policies also contradict the findings and recommendations of “Incentives and Test-Based Accountability in Education,” the important report released last year by the National Research Council of the National Academies of Science That study’s distinguished panel of experts concluded that high-stakes testing has not improved educational quality
  Widespread cheating is an inevitable consequence of overuses of high-stakes testing, as predicted by renowned social scientist Donald Campbell In 1976 he wrote in what is now called Campbell’s Law, “The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor when test scores become the goal of the teaching process, they both lose their value as indicators of educational status and distort the educational process in undesirable ways”
  Recent examinations of major outbreaks of cheating confirm the accuracy of Campbell’s prediction In Atlanta, Georgia, for example, the Governor’s Bureau of Investigation found that test score misuse was amajor reason for why cheating occurred They wrote, “The targets were often unreasonable, especially given their cumulative effect over the years Additionally, the administration put unreasonable pressure on teachers and principals to achieve targets ultimately, the data and meeting ‘targets’ by whatever means necessary, became more important than true academic progress”
  In their report on the Dougherty County System, the Georgia Special Investigators identified similar causes In the section titled “Why Cheating Occurred,” the investigators cite No Child Left Behind’s “pressure to meet AYP targets” as “a significant motivation for cheating” finding, “This pressure drives some individuals to cross ethical lines” They concluded, “Since the enactment of NCLB, standardized testing has become more about measuring the teachers, principals and schools than accurately assessing the children’s academic progress”
  In terms of “best practices” for detecting and responding to testing irregularities, there is no need for a massive federal study The reports by the Georgia Office of Special Investigators examining cheating in Atlanta area schools are a model for policy-maker response A comprehensive review by independent law enforcement professionals — not politicians or bureaucrats who may have vested interests in protecting current policies and personnel — is necessary Combined with the use of the full range of forensic detection tools — including analyses for high numbers of erasures, unusual score gains, and patterns of similar responses — this approach has proven most likely to root out the full truth
  More policing and better after-the-fact investigations will not, however, solve the many problems caused by the politically motivated misuses of standardized exam scores Instead, high-stakes testing requirements must end because they cheat students out of a high-quality education and cheat the public out of accurate information about school quality

欢迎分享,转载请注明来源:品搜搜测评网

原文地址:https://pinsoso.cn/meirong/3322510.html

(0)
打赏 微信扫一扫微信扫一扫 支付宝扫一扫支付宝扫一扫
上一篇 2024-02-17
下一篇2024-02-17

随机推荐

  • 草舍名院套盒怎么样

    草舍名院套盒是一款护肤品,其口碑和性价比都比较好。但是,具体使用效果会因人而异,因为每个人的肤质和需求不同。以下是草舍名院套盒的特点:1 温和无刺激:草舍名院套盒的成分比较温和,不含刺激性物质,适合各种肤质使用。2 保湿效果好:套盒中的护肤

    2024-04-15
    1061800
  • 现在黄金卖出去多少钱一克

    2018年国际金融市场波动较往年大,2018年以来黄金原料价格基本在269到275元克之间徘徊。黄金回收价格需要在此基础上减去对应费用,一般是10元每克左右,经济欠发达的地区可能会相对低一些,如果当地回收价格确实太低的话,可以看看贵金属网

    2024-04-15
    44800
  • 朱一龙都代言了什么?

    朱一龙代言的品牌有:1、TOM FORD2019年8月2日,TOMFORDBEAUTY微博发文:TOM FORD中国区品牌香氛形象大使朱一龙,邀你携手进入奢华而馥郁的香氛世界。2、可口可乐2019年5月23日,朱一龙成为可口可乐品牌形象代言

    2024-04-15
    47000
  • 精华露和精华液的区别

    精华露和精华液的区别:成分不同、质地不同、适用肤质不同、使用部位不同、使用年龄不同。1、成分不同首先精华液成分是植物以及矿物质等,精华露是乳液里面的一种,使用精华露后,就不能再去使用其它乳液,精华露并不适合冬季使用。2、质地不同精华露因为是

    2024-04-15
    50500
  • 什么补水喷雾好?

    1 妮维雅娇柔爽肤水(粉)49元:的确是很好用的一款 拍到脸上 润润的 不含酒精 也很耐用呢 不错不错(摇后泡沫细腻丰富,厚厚的一层而且经久不消。泡泡少说明营养成分少,泡泡多但大说明含有水杨酸,洁肤效果好但敏感肌肤尽量不要用,泡泡多且细但很

    2024-04-15
    37900
  • 唇膏品牌的十大排行榜

    排名在前十的唇膏品牌有:资生堂MOILIP修护润唇膏、伊丽莎白·雅顿经典润唇膏、NIVEA妮维雅天然型润唇膏、Blistex百蕾适小蓝罐、Burt'sBees伯特小蜜蜂润唇膏、曼秀雷敦天然植物润唇膏、Vaseline凡士林玫瑰润唇

    2024-04-15
    38200

发表评论

登录后才能评论
保存