以琳用英语怎么说

以琳翻译为英语为：Elim。读音： ['ɪlɪm] 。

Elim可以组成的短语为：

1、纽约以琳圣经学院 Elim Bible Institute；

2、香港路德会以琳堂 Elim Lutheran Church；

Elim的例句：

1、And from Marah they went on to Elim: and in Elim there were twelve water-springs and seventy palm-trees; and they put up their tents there 

翻译：从玛拉起行，来到以琳（以琳有十二股水泉，七十棵棕树），就在那里安营。

2、Elim in at in g students 'psychological barriers; 

翻译：消除学生学习的心理障碍；

3、Analysis of the faults of 738 biochemical analyzer and the elim in ations

翻译：738生化分析仪故障分析与排除。

扩展资料

“以琳”原文最早出自《圣经》出埃及记15:27节〔他们到了以琳，在那里有十二股水泉，七十棵棕树，他们就在那里的水边安营。〕“以琳”是甜的意思。

“以琳”开始并非人物名称，而是一个地名。在圣经里人物名字通常作为地名来用，“以琳”作为人名来用也很有意义。

例如：老师时常给学生鼓励或评语说，希望你像以琳之地，有丰富的泉水(就是圣经真理知识)和有像棕树那样挺拔的身躯(能将福音传开)，将来好好为主作工，多结果子。

以琳还是古巴勒斯坦地名。位于红海东面，今苏伊士湾东岸。以色列人在摩西的带领下离开埃及渡过红海后，曾在以琳安营。

以琳的前站是玛拉，以色列民在旷野走了三天找不到水喝，玛拉的水是苦的，希伯来语“玛拉”就是苦的意思，众民在玛拉怨声载道。

by是介词，后面的动词要加ing形式，这和进行时一般时没关系。to others表示给其他人，这个“其他人”有几个是无所谓的，而to the others就表示一定是其他“所有”人，这里没必要强调to其他“所有”人。

　　Over the past three academic years, the National Center for Fair & Open Testing has confirmed cases of standardized test cheating in 32 states and the District of Columbia (see attached list) The root cause of this epidemic is clear from in-depth investigations into some of the most egregious scandals Misuse of standardized tests mandated by public officials has created a climate in which increasing numbers of educators feel they have no choice but to cross ethical lines

　　If the US Department of Education is serious about its commitment to assessment integrity, it must act to reduce test cheating by stopping promotion of test score misuse

　　Despite their high-sounding statements about assessment reform, President Obama and Secretary Duncan are adding incentives for cheating by ratcheting up the emphasis on standardized exams scores through initiatives such as “Race to the Top” and their criteria for states to receive waivers from “No Child Left Behind” The continued emphasis on annual high-stakes annual testing in these programs and, especially, new requirements to assess teachers based on their students’ scores virtually guarantees even more cheating will take place

　　The administration’s favored policies also contradict the findings and recommendations of “Incentives and Test-Based Accountability in Education,” the important report released last year by the National Research Council of the National Academies of Science That study’s distinguished panel of experts concluded that high-stakes testing has not improved educational quality

　　Widespread cheating is an inevitable consequence of overuses of high-stakes testing, as predicted by renowned social scientist Donald Campbell In 1976 he wrote in what is now called Campbell’s Law, “The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor when test scores become the goal of the teaching process, they both lose their value as indicators of educational status and distort the educational process in undesirable ways”

　　Recent examinations of major outbreaks of cheating confirm the accuracy of Campbell’s prediction In Atlanta, Georgia, for example, the Governor’s Bureau of Investigation found that test score misuse was amajor reason for why cheating occurred They wrote, “The targets were often unreasonable, especially given their cumulative effect over the years Additionally, the administration put unreasonable pressure on teachers and principals to achieve targets ultimately, the data and meeting ‘targets’ by whatever means necessary, became more important than true academic progress”

　　In their report on the Dougherty County System, the Georgia Special Investigators identified similar causes In the section titled “Why Cheating Occurred,” the investigators cite No Child Left Behind’s “pressure to meet AYP targets” as “a significant motivation for cheating” finding, “This pressure drives some individuals to cross ethical lines” They concluded, “Since the enactment of NCLB, standardized testing has become more about measuring the teachers, principals and schools than accurately assessing the children’s academic progress”

　　In terms of “best practices” for detecting and responding to testing irregularities, there is no need for a massive federal study The reports by the Georgia Office of Special Investigators examining cheating in Atlanta area schools are a model for policy-maker response A comprehensive review by independent law enforcement professionals — not politicians or bureaucrats who may have vested interests in protecting current policies and personnel — is necessary Combined with the use of the full range of forensic detection tools — including analyses for high numbers of erasures, unusual score gains, and patterns of similar responses — this approach has proven most likely to root out the full truth

　　More policing and better after-the-fact investigations will not, however, solve the many problems caused by the politically motivated misuses of standardized exam scores Instead, high-stakes testing requirements must end because they cheat students out of a high-quality education and cheat the public out of accurate information about school quality